Lima and Dill’s predator-prey model
“In this article, we gather ecological theories and empirical data from a variety of related fields in an attempt to create a unified model of how humans predict, respond to, control and learn about danger. We will discuss hierarchical theories of threat, how these hierarchies are represented within a global neural architecture, and present evidence for components of an optimized survival system in humans, which is consistent with (c.f. Blanchard et al., 2011), and sometimes distinct from those observed in other animals.
The Survival Optimization System (SOS) is based on the assumption that a set of systems have evolved to avoid and combat threats that pose danger to the species’ fitness. These extend from neurocognitive systems that predict the sensory environment, orienting toward potential threat, assessing threat and escape possibilities, and to hard-wired defensive reactions instantiated by the oldest sectors of the nervous system. In tandem, these survival strategies are steered by modulatory systems including cognitive appraisal and learning systems.”
Source: Frontiers | The ecology of human fear: survival optimization and the nervous system | Neuroscience
Fantastic read. I’ve taken a pause from the Dias book to have a look at the research (some which he cited, some which he didn’t.) This paper is particularly interesting (and available free by clicking on the link above.) A bell rang in my head yesterday which reminded me of something I read on the similarities between human and ant societies…
I’ll await your critique
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just what he said.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah please, me too, 140 characters inc. smileys.
LikeLiked by 2 people
At your age I understand the need for brevity π
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ageist bastard!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ex-cuse me. I’m the firstborn. The bastard is the one in Tahiti.
I’ve been meaning to ask you… do you not think contentment might be unhelpful to us as animals? I say as animals because I know it may be helpful to the mind.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know what you mean. We all have desires, of course. Then we can break those down into preferences on the one hand (and to which we have a certain degree of emotional neutrality towards), and cravings on the other (to which we have intense emotional attachments). I would say the contented human animal, rare beast that s/he is, is without craving and its polar opposite, hatred, though is not without preferences, and may pursue those energetically, yet still without attachment, meaning without an emotional neediness. S/he continues to evolve in this disposition.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: The ecology of human fear: survival optimization and the nervous system | Neuroscience β Just Merveilleux? – ~*~tightlines and sunshine~*~
Pingback: The ecology of human fear: survival optimization and the nervous system | Neuroscience β Just Merveilleux? | Team OCC
I would like to reblog this lateron this year, any objections? Not everybody does like this, therefore I am now always asking. Thanks for your Kind attention. Bye, bye @ Ulli
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi, Ulli
Feel free to re-blog anything you like here. I’m a believer in sharing information π
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very good, I am a great fan of diversity AS perception of the same may be very varied individually.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haven’t read the article, yet, but doesn’t it all end up in the amygdala? It’s an incredibly powerful area of the brain, and once it learns to ‘fear’ something, unlearning that fear is reeeeeal hard. Phobias, fear of spiders, irrational fears, fear of spiders….
LikeLike
p.s. just read the first couple of pages. Despite having read some of this stuff before, I found my eyes crossing. D’you think he could have composed sentences any more convoluted???? You’re a better man than me, Gungadin!
LikeLike