That paragraph from Marx’s Wage Labour & Capital distills the entire concept of Festinger’s Social Comparison Theory. It’s the backbone of the psychological manipulation that occurs/occurred in communist and fascist regimes alike. It’s also what Trump and the Brexiteers exploit when they frame society in terms of “us”, the virtuous victims vs. “them”, the alleged elites.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
A society in which a blithering idiot like Karl Marx is held in esteem is a society in a state of catastrophic collapse.
In what hallucination do palaces miraculously spring up among the poor or even a middle class suburb?
And there in lies the idiocy of Karl Marx.
LikeLike
So you didn’t understand a word he said?
LikeLiked by 3 people
In what alternative hallucination can THE Donald be compared with Karl Marx?
LikeLike
. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Marx got many things absolutely right. The problem is with practical conclusions and their implementation.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Agrudinsky,
Karl Marx got exactly everything wrong.
That’s why he’s a blithering idiot.
Like Plato’s “Republic,” the world of Karl Marx is an all out assault on everything that is human.
That’s why Marxism fails every time it is tried.
LikeLike
So please explain Marxism to the world in one paragraph- just for fun?
LikeLike
Mr. Merveilleux,
Marxism in one sentence or less:
Marxism takes everything that is wrong with the free market and puts it on steroids.
LikeLike
I’m surprised you’d say that as there’s so much in common in the spirit of Catholicism with Marxism.
LikeLike
In what hallucination do palaces miraculously spring up among the poor? Clearly you haven’t witnessed the gentrification of Williamsburg, Brooklyn.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Or Capri where fisherman’s houses have turned into mansions…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Cara,
I have indeed seen gentrification.
It has nothing to do with palaces springing up among the poor.
It has everything to do with restoring once wonderful neighborhoods that have since been completely destroyed by urban blight.
LikeLike
Mr. Merveilleux,
I’ll bet the fisherman who owned the old home made out like a bandit.
LikeLike
Which makes Cara’s point verifiably true. So you sort of have to admit to her she was right.
LikeLike
Not exactly. Some people view it as “destroying the culture” and oppose it with all their political might. In Portland, Oregon, the black community has blocked the building of a nice clean grocery store in their neighborhood claiming that gentrification would attract those well-to-do people (read “white”) killing their “culture” (of poverty?). They claimed that white people moving into the black neighborhood and making it, well, not so black, is a manifestation of racism. Weird…
http://www.vice.com/read/portland-trader-joes-twir
LikeLiked by 1 person
A few months ago (or maybe more) some Scottish researchers found that incidents of air rage were higher if Economy passengers walked first through 1st/Business class on their way to the back.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I bet!
LikeLiked by 1 person
John,
People getting a look at their own inadequacies is wisdom in the making.
Throwing a temper tantrum in public is mental illness not to be blamed on people who can afford 1st class.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like to snigger and point as I watch the herds pass towards the back. Sometimes I even offer a glass of wine, then say I was just kidding.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Avoiding social comparisons is the key to happier and longer life.
LikeLiked by 2 people
And yet it’s what makes the commercial world turn.
LikeLiked by 1 person
agrudzinsky,
Hobnobbing with the rich and famous is inspiring…
…that is if the plebe lives in a free market economy where he can become filthy rich if he so desires.
LikeLike
…that is if your goal is to become filthy rich. For me, the advantage of living in a free society is not the chance of getting filthy rich. It’s the freedom to choose my own goals and values. Measuring my own success by the size of my neighbor’s house does not make sense to me.
LikeLiked by 2 people
How curious that Marx or whoever he was channelling, got that particular aspect of human nature right, but failed so miserably to predict that humans would NOT, by nature, be altruistic? I admit, I haven’t read Das Capital, but I always wondered why psychological considerations played no part in his manifesto. Maybe I should try and read it… 😦
LikeLiked by 2 people
You do realize he was born in Germany? 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Now, now… 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mr. Merveilleux,
I always thought that the words, “Das Capital” were dead give aways of some sort of German origin.
LikeLike
acflory,
It is the mad obsession of the Marxist to create the “New Man.”
LikeLike
-sigh- As if that’s ever worked. I think Capitalism has worked for as long as it has because it recognizes the basic self-centeredness of human beings. Like any political theory, however, it has a fatal flaw – capitalism only works when it is balanced by competition, but what we see now is corporatism, and corporatism strives to quash competition, leading to…a corporate oligarchy?
Anyway, in the biological world, Darwin wasn’t completely right – it’s not all about competition. In reality, competition is balanced by co-operation, a lesson we could all learn.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I wouldn’t say that humans are selfish by nature. If it were so, you wouldn’t see massive self-sacrifices and heroism during the war time. There is a fundamental conflict between individual and collective good. In a free society, they maintain a natural balance. When individualism outweighs collectivism, measures are taken in another direction: anti-trust laws, corporate regulations, welfare programs, and health care reforms are adopted. When people get fed up with these socialist tendencies, Republicans (or whatever the equivalent is) win elections and things go the other direction until another bubble bursts. And so on.
In totalitarian countries, propaganda and brainwashing skew the collective mentality towards collectivism, but it cannot be sustained for too long. People are called to give up individual good for collective good, but it’s a lie. In reality, they are called to give up their good for the good of those who controls the propaganda.
LikeLike
When my wife and I were looking to buy a house, once in a while we came to a suburban neighborhood at the edge of the city line with large expensive new houses with views and well-groomed landscaping. On the corner of that neighborhood, there would stand a small and very old house. Guess why and who is likely to be the richest in this neighborhood?
LikeLiked by 2 people
The corner house used to own all the land around it 😛
LikeLiked by 3 people
wow, SOM is surely putting on quite a display here. We’ve gone from the free market is wrong and somehow Marx is the exemplar of this, to hilariously racist bullshit about “urban blight”, and then to how great it is to have lots and lots of money. Our little fella who is so enamored of Trump is having a bit of a meltdown, I fear. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
The religious mind doesn’t have serious parameters- nor is evidence a serious consideration. Rather, they train themselves to recite positions that are popular in their circles 😉
LikeLike
well, he’s reciting *something*. &) oh well, he’ll be a great test subject if heaven does exist and if liars get into it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
OMG when I opened this page, the advert said “brought to you by Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.” I know you can’t control the ads, Pinky, but …. tooo droll. or dooo troll.
LikeLike